Login | Sign Up

Archive for June, 2010

The Last Hooah

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

The brouhaha surrounding an explosive Rolling Stone profile, leading to the firing and retirement of General Stanley McChrystal, has had a fascinating unintended consequence. All of a sudden truth – or a form of it – has erupted in certain quarters. What a show.

The rare outbreak of candor started when freelance reporter Michael Hastings was granted unfettered access to commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan General Stanley McChrystal. What started as a normal interview turned into a month-long juggernaut of travel and drunken hijinks thanks to the eruption of the Eyjafjallajökull volcano in Iceland. The resulting profile yielded a veritable bevy of macho and shockingly candid quotes by McChrystal and his frat boy aides, who call themselves “Team America.” The General and his boys spare no one from their contempt, from Vice President Biden (“bite me”) to Special Envoy Richard Holbrooke to Ambassador Karl Eikenberry to National Security Advisor Jim Jones (“a clown”) and, of course, President Barack Obama. The head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen was spared. In other words, the gang Hastings was covering demonstrated their open contempt for their civilian counterparts and brought into stark relief the deep fissures in the U.S.’s team tasked to “win” in Afghanistan and Pakistan. All in all, the Rolling Stone article was a remarkable and revelatory piece of reporting.

The article had Washington scratching its collective head. What was McChrystal thinking? How could he have let his “boys” engage is such juvenile behavior in the company of a reporter? The hapless press aide who arranged the interview was the first casualty of the public relations disaster. Eventually McChrystal’s head would roll as well.

When the backlash eventually ensued it was not McChrystal’s judgment that was questioned. Hastings became the designated whipping boy.

And what a backlash it’s been. The Washington press corps has taken particular umbrage that a freelance reporter from an unserious, hippie magazine would have the gall to print such an article so embarrassing to its subject. One former Pentagon correspondent chimed in:

The dirty little secret among beat reporters who routinely travel with top military officials is that there’s a unwritten code, a general understanding, that off-color jokes, irreverent banter, and casual conversations are generally off-the-record, or on the deepest of background, unless otherwise agreed upon.

There was navel gazing about the “complex” relationship between source and journalist. There was an utterly bizarre column in the New York Times opining that Hastings broke the rules of etiquette by violating McChrystal’s privacy. Reporters were shocked that Hastings would commit the unimaginable gaffe of burning his bridges in such a spectacular matter (Hastings has made it clear that he has no bridges to burn).

But the most spectacular statement came from CBS News correspondent Lara Logan, the same Lara Logan who “reported” a shameless profile of Blackwater (now Xe) founder Erik Prince, an interview with questions so soft and revealing so little substance that it could have been produced by Blackwater’s PR department. Logan’s statements on CNN’s “Reliable Sources” were the clearest demonstration of the unhealthy dynamic between the mainstream press and the powerful subjects they cover. Her shockingly McCarthy-like observation that “Michael Hastings has never served his country the way McChrystal has” should ring a warning bell at CBS and serve as an indication that perhaps Logan would be better off running the Pentagon’s Public Affairs office instead of posing as a reporter.

What seems to have been forgotten is that Rolling Stone gave McChrystal the opportunity to refute the article and the quotes before going to press. The General gave the publication the thumbs up. By his own admission he voted for Barack Obama. Evidently he banned Fox News from his headquarters. The General is no babe in the woods when it comes to the media. He shrewdly manipulated the press on a number of notorious occasions, including the Pat Tillman scandal and detainee abuse. He also used the media to strong arm Obama into writing the General a blank check for his operation in Afghanistan.

The only member of this mob who retained his dignity was Hastings himself:

Look, I went into journalism to do journalism, not advertising. My views are critical but that shouldn’t be mistaken for hostile – I’m just not a stenographer. There is a body of work that shows how I view these issues but that was hard-earned through experience, not something I learned going to a cocktail party on f*****g K Street. That’s what reporters are supposed to do, report the story.

So McChrystal is off to write his memoirs and serve on corporate boards, the press have covered themselves in shame and, if there’s any justice in the world, Michael Hastings will be nominated for the Pulitzer. But there’s a silver lining to this clown show.

The U.S. Constitution gives the President, a civilian, the power of Commander in Chief. In that capacity he has the authority to fire military commanders at will. Never in the history of the Republic has an aggrieved military man attempted to overthrow the civilian who has the final word. Generals who felt the tug to aspire to that office have run for it. Some have won, some have lost.

It’s gratifying to know that when it comes to transfer of power, the cynical American public can rest assured that it won’t come at the barrel of a gun.

U.S. Embassy launches campaign to correct errors in Pakistani media

Monday, June 28th, 2010

by Karen Brulliard

ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN — Some reports are deemed “a paranoid fabrication,” such as the claim that all Pakistanis are stripped naked in U.S. airports.

Others are “false and malicious,” such as the one about the Americans moving Pakistani Taliban leaders to Afghanistan to prepare them for a battle against Pakistan’s army.

So says the U.S. Embassy here, which for nearly eight months has issued statements countering every major error about American foreign policy that it finds in Pakistan’s boisterous media.

It’s a herculean task that embassy officials say has been undertaken by no other U.S. mission in the world — because nowhere else, those officials say, does U.S. policy face such disdain and misrepresentation.

The statements — called “Corrections for the Record” — are issued a handful of times a month. Whether they are effective is hard to measure, though embassy officials express confidence. Taken together, the missives serve as a chronicle of the uphill battle the U.S. government faces in Pakistan in its sometimes clumsy efforts to influence opinion.

Much is at stake. The Obama administration views Pakistan as a crucial partner in its fight against Islamist terrorism, and it has spent the past year trying to convince Pakistanis that the United States is a steadfast, well-intentioned ally. So far the public has not been swayed: A recent Pew Research Center survey found that 17 percent of Pakistanis view the United States favorably, and only 8 percent expressed faith in President Obama — his lowest rating in 22 countries surveyed.

The corrections have challenged widely believed theories in a nation with a penchant for conspiracies: that Americans were behind deadly bombings (“absurd, baseless”) or plotting a “massive infiltration” by U.S. Marines of Pakistan’s militant-riddled tribal areas (“entirely false”).

The correction campaign comes as the media in Pakistan grow in size and influence. As of 2002, there was one state-owned television station in Pakistan. Now there are more than 90 private channels, many of which feature roundtable-style political debate, plus countless newspapers, magazines and journals.

The content is raucous and the journalists are free, within certain nebulous limits; many avoid criticism of the powerful security establishment, though they savage the civilian government. The United States, which is expanding its footprint here, often features as an all-powerful schemer, a depiction embassy officials complain is exacerbated when Pakistani journalists do not seek the American side of the story.

Some observers, though, say the real problem is the two nations’ spy novel-like relations. Secrets surround so many aspects of the relationship that the resulting vacuum is easily filled by rumors.

Against that backdrop, some Pakistani journalists say, official embassy denials carry little weight. “Our government does not have a history of giving out information. If the U.S. pulls another Pakistan on the Pakistani media . . . it’s only natural they would be hostile,” media analyst Adnan Rehmat said. “The hostility stems from this space where secrecy is the norm.”

That attitude has been compounded by confirmations — in the American press — of reports that initially seemed to be wacky conspiracy theories, said Huma Yusuf, a columnist for Dawn newspaper. Those CIA drones that strike militant mountain hideouts? Turned out they are indeed allowed by Pakistan, despite the government’s public denials. The rumors about U.S. troops on Pakistani soil? American officials confirmed in 2008 that U.S. commandos had conducted a ground raid and more recently that about 200 Special Forces are training elements of Pakistan’s military.

Still, Yusuf said, many of Pakistan’s newly minted journalists are learning as they go, and “making stuff up” is a common way to generate news.

“If you can take even the slightest thing and turn it into a story that proves the U.S. is the evil demon . . . it’s going to sell papers,” Yusuf said.

Embassy officials say that they have stepped up interaction with Pakistani media but that the embassy’s press shop — set to grow to five people by next year — is small for the job.

The U.S. special envoy for the region, Richard Holbrooke, has met with Pakistani journalists on many of his visits, as have many U.S. lawmakers while passing through, said Larry Schwartz, the embassy’s senior spokesman. They often focus on the less-clandestine aspects of the U.S.-Pakistan relationship, such as aid for power plants and schools, even if the news media do not.

“We really are trying to develop a meaningful and supportive relationship with this country,” Schwartz said. “The distortions that we see in the media do need to be countered.”

In this duel, the embassy says its biggest foe is the Nation, an English-language newspaper. It has published photos of houses it says were rented by menacing American operatives employed by the security company Blackwater; in one case, according to a U.S. Embassy correction, the resident was a U.S. aid worker.

More recently, the newspaper reported what it called “stark confirmation of the vicious U.S. agenda”: Police had detained a U.S. military official driving an “ammunition-laden vehicle” and “trading heavy weaponry.” The embassy retorted that the truck carried “equipment” used in Special Forces training, with the consent of authorities.

Shireen Mizari, the editor of the Nation, responded to questions about its coverage and the embassy corrections in her column.

“If the police confirm a piece of information, we have no reason to doubt it,” she wrote of the article about the truck. Regarding the house photos, she wrote that “if we see anyone doing something suspicious, it is our job to report it.”

But the market for English-language newspapers is small. Television, where 70 percent of Pakistanis get their news and anti-Western venom flows, may be the biggest arbiter of public opinion. The embassy rarely issues corrections about television reports, which are too numerous to monitor.

Even so, the Americans might want to lighten up, Rehmat said. Given the surge in programming, most has nothing to do with the United States, and some is even positive, he said. Instead of corrections, the embassy should focus on getting more American scholars, scientists, artists and athletes — not just Washington officials — into Pakistan to mingle with journalists.

“For us, America is either Obama or Bush, or it’s 50 Cent and Michael Jackson,” he said. “We’re missing all the other amazing spectrum.”

——

This story originally appeared in The Washington Post

Pakistan wants combat copters

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

By Eli Lake – The Washington Times

Pakistan is seeking advanced U.S. attack helicopters and other weapons as part of a comprehensive arms package to bolster preparations for what its military is calling a “silent surge” of more than 100,000 troops into the mountain lairs of al Qaeda’s senior leadership in the country’s Northwest Frontier Province. “I have been ambassador here for two years, and all I have to show for it is eight secondhand Mi-17 transport helicopters for a war that requires helicopters to root out al Qaeda and the Taliban,” Pakistan’s ambassador to Washington, Husain Haqqani, said in an interview with The Washington Times.

The ambassador said, “Military operations would have been (more…)

South Asian slaves in Dubai

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

By Ishtiaq Ahmed

A few days ago my older son wrote to me from Stockholm to convey his shock over a short documentary he saw by BBC’s Ben Anderson entitled ‘The Slaves of Dubai’. It is about the heart-wrenching plight of South Asian workers who arrive in Dubai in the hope of alleviating the abject poverty they are born in but end up becoming virtually bonded labour. They can also be called slaves. He wrote: “I was really shocked and upset about their situation. If you have not already written about it, can you please do it in your next column?”

So, this essay is largely to disseminate information about the construction industry mafia (more…)

Expert on Afghanistan questions anti-Pakistan blusters

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

A prominent expert on Afghanistan has questioned a Harvard researcher’s suggestion that Pakistan covertly supports Afghan Taliban, arguing that “blusters” cited in the recent report are too sweeping and superficial to be credible.

Journalist and author Imtiaz Gul, who is in the United States for the launch of his book “The Most Dangerous Place – Pakistan’s Lawless Frontier,” said allegations made in the report run counter to the current context, when the country and its security forces are facing worst wave of retaliatory militant violence. “I don’t believe in this (more…)

Pakistan’s spy agency is said to collaborate with the Taliban

Monday, June 14th, 2010

By Alex Rodriguez, Los Angeles Times

Pakistan’s powerful intelligence agency not only funds and trains Taliban insurgents fighting U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan, but also maintains its own representation on the insurgency’s leadership council, claims a new report issued by the London School of Economics.

Assertions that Pakistan’s intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence, continues to nurture links with the Afghan Taliban are not new. But the scope of that relationship claimed by the report’s author, Matt Waldman, is startling and could prove damaging to the fragile alliance Washington is trying to foster with Pakistan, its military establishment, (more…)

U.S. Pakistan seek to broaden defense relationship

Saturday, June 12th, 2010

U.S. and Pakistani defense officials wrapped up a four-day session in Pakistan today aimed at expanding the two countries’ defense relationship to address current and future threats.

The Pakistan-U.S. Strategic Dialogue Defense Working Group, known as the Exchange on Defense Planning, met at Pakistan’s Joint Staff Headquarters in Rawalpindi as part of the strategic dialogue process, embassy officials in Islamabad reported.

The just-concluded Pakistan session aimed to build on progress made during the U.S.-Pakistan strategic dialogue meetings held here three months ago. (more…)

US presses Pakistan for more data on travelers

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

By Eric Schmitt – NY Times

The Obama administration is increasing pressure on Pakistan to provide the United States with much broader airline passenger information, a crucial tool that American investigators use to track terrorist travel patterns, but a step that Pakistan has resisted, American officials said Sunday.

Pakistan, like other countries, currently provides the names of airline passengers traveling to the United States. But the administration is pressing for information on Pakistanis who fly to other countries, to feed into databases that can detect patterns used by terrorists, their financiers, logisticians and others who support them, the officials said. (more…)

The demand for Pakistan and Islam

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

By Prof Ishtiaq Ahmed

The recent attack on a congregation of Ahmedis during prayers, which claimed more than 90 innocent lives, has revived a discussion as to whether there is a connection between the creation of Pakistan and Islam. Within the Muslim League there was always a constituency in favour of Pakistan becoming an Islamic state. One of its proponents was a close confident of Jinnah: Raja Sahib Mahmudabad, a Shia. In 1939 he wrote to the historian Mohibul Hassan:

“When we speak of democracy in Islam it is not democracy in the government (more…)

Are Pakistanis an unjust people?

Friday, June 4th, 2010

By Mahjabeen Islam – The Daily Times, Pakistan

It is like the pot, read Pakistanis, calling the kettle, read Israelis, black. Over 100 Ahmedis were massacred while praying and the protest from the Pakistani nation was individual, muted, minimal, and quickly forgotten. Just a few days later, Israel kills 9 activists in the Freedom Flotilla and Pakistanis were aflame in cities across the nation, pelting stones at police, burning cars and property. Protestors in Karachi included fully veiled women with children facing water cannons and police batons.

Is there something wrong with this picture, or is it just me? (more…)



Powered by Hashe!