Login | Sign Up

Posts Tagged ‘Asif Zardari’

Our security depends on aiding Pakistan

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

By Eileen M. O’Connor

On Defense Secretary Robert Gates’s recent trip to Pakistan, he was reportedly asked by one Pakistani military official, “Are you with us or against us?” to which the defense secretary replied, “Of course, we’re with you.” But who precisely did the secretary mean by “you”? For both the U.S. and Pakistan’s interests, the “you” must mean the people who support the three principles of democracy, the rule of law, and civilian control in Pakistan — and, specifically, not those who would undermine them.

Two recent developments show that these principles are in danger, and that should trouble both U.S. and Pakistani policymakers concerned about Pakistan’s security and stability.

First, the Pakistani Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Ifitkhar Chaudry, (more…)

Should we bid farewell to democracy?

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

By Raza Rumi

Many decades ago, our Governor General-President Iskander Mirza had rather contemptuously stated that democracy does not suit the genius of Pakistani people. Immediately after these words of wisdom were uttered, direct military rule not only exiled Mirza but also became a norm rather than aberration. For the last six decades or so we have not been able to overcome this political reality. The unelected institutions of the state are not willing to give up the power they inherited from the might of the colonial state. At best, they are willing to share power to a degree that they deem fit.

It is now clear that within a few months Pakistan is due for another political upheaval. Barely two years after an election took place, the political elites are back in business (more…)

For Pakistan, No Turning Back From Reform

Saturday, January 16th, 2010

By Asif Ali Zardari

When I was elected president more than a year ago, Pakistan was in grave condition, strained by terrorism and a ravaged economy. Countering the effects of a decade of dictatorship requires bold actions, some of which are unpopular. I am working with Parliament to run a country, not a political campaign. The goal of our democratic government is to implement policies that will dramatically improve the lives of Pakistanis. In time, good policies will become good politics.

Our economic crisis demanded unprecedented response. On taxes, education, agriculture and energy, we have shown that we must adapt, reform and become self-sufficient. Terrorists do not want Pakistan to succeed. They want to distract us from preparing for a stable and prosperous future. (more…)

Glimmers of hope on horizon in Pakistan

Monday, January 11th, 2010

By Trudy Rubin – Philadelphia Inquirer Opinion Columnist

Never mind all the media fuss about Yemen over the last couple of weeks.

When it comes to fighting Islamist terrorists, our biggest security headache is still inside Pakistan , where al-Qaeda and hard-line Taliban hide along the Afghan border. The double agent who just blew up a CIA base in Khost got help from those Taliban. They threaten U.S. troops in Afghanistan and endanger Pakistan .

But let me offer a bit of good news. There are signs, far from conclusive but promising, that key elements of the Pakistani army now recognize the danger. And there are even hopeful glimmers on the often-depressing Pakistani political front.

On the surface, things in Pakistan may look like the same old same old. Elements of the Pakistani army and Inter Services Intelligence spy agency (ISI) remain deeply suspicious about U.S. intentions and convinced that their jihadi problem is the fault of the United States .

This hostility is reflected in the recent, crude harassment of U.S. diplomats and denial of visas to U.S. envoys and aid personnel (I’m told the visa issue will soon be resolved). Pakistan criticizes attacks by U.S. predator drones on Taliban targets inside their country while privately cooperating with the targeting.

Yet here is the first piece of good news: Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari seems to have weathered a campaign by opponents, including the military, to force him out of office. Zardari has deep flaws, but his ouster would have hampered efforts to fight the jihadis. So would the removal, now averted, of Pakistan ‘s effective ambassador to Washington, Husain Haqqani, whom the Pakistani military had unfairly blamed for conditions that Congress imposed on aid to Pakistan .

Despite his reputation for corruption and poor governance, Zardari does recognize the existential threat that Islamic militants pose to the Pakistani state. He has urged the military to confront the jihadis and cooperate with the United States .

Moreover, Zardari seems to have finally realized that he needs to act like a leader and rally his own people. Unlike his late wife, former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, he had refused to travel the country, or visit war zones, or address a Pakistani public bewildered by economic crisis and a wave of grisly suicide bombings. However, in recent weeks, Zardari has finally begun barnstorming, talking of the dangers to democracy.

Second piece of good news: Pakistan ‘s military leadership now seems to recognize the need to battle some jihadis. The army was forced to fight in the spring in the Swat valley, when one group of Pakistani Taliban violated a peace deal. It had to expand the fight to tribal South Waziristan when Taliban based there struck military targets around the country.

But the Obama administration has urged the Pakistani military to go further and attack the bases of Afghan Taliban allied with al-Qaeda who cross the border and kill U.S. troops. These Taliban include the Haqqani network (no relation to the ambassador), which is allied to al-Qaeda as well as the Quetta Shura headed by Mullah Mohammed Omar.

So far, the Pakistani military has resisted expanding the fight, saying it has too much on its plate and no public support for such a move. Many analysts believe the army will never target the Afghan Taliban because it could become an important ally if the United States quits Kabul and the Taliban regains power .

However, the U.S. military appears cautiously optimistic about future cooperation with its Pakistani counterparts. Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, praised Pakistan ‘s military commander, Gen. Ashfaq Kayani, and his operations against the Taliban in remarks delivered last week at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Mullen said the Pakistani army’s “change in focus” and its “removal of troops from the East, from the Kashmir border [with India ] to fight in the West . . . is very much tied to recognition that they have a serious problem in their own country.” The admiral has visited Pakistan 14 times since becoming chairman in an effort to build trust between our two militaries.

Will the Pakistani army ever be willing to attack the Haqqani network? Mullen’s response: “Gen. Kayani and I have spoken specifically about the Haqqani network many times, and there is increased pressure being brought on that network.” But Mullen also said it was “unfair” to expect an attack on Haqqani’s men when Pakistani forces were still engaged in South Waziristan nearby. “I’m not one that says they’re not going to do this,” he added.

Mullen said he saw a shift in the way the Pakistani military and ISI were looking at their future security needs, a shift that would be influenced by whether a more stable situation emerges in Afghanistan . “It’s going to take some time,” the admiral added. “There’s a patience level we all have to recognize.”

We’ll see this year whether these glimmers of hope are overly optimistic, and whether Pakistan and the United States can really move toward closer cooperation. The Pakistani military may ultimately find it has no other choice.

U.S. senators defend Pakistan drone attacks

Saturday, January 9th, 2010

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) – U.S. senators defended on Friday American drone aircraft strikes in Pakistan, an issue likely to become more volatile if Washington intensifies the attacks to hunt down enemies after the bombing of CIA agents in Afghanistan.

Pakistan officially objects to the drone attacks, saying they violate its sovereignty. And it has pushed Washington to provide it with the drones to allow it to carry out its own attacks.

“We don’t agree on every issue. We believe that, as I have stated and as our government has stated, that it is one of many tools that we must use to try to defeat a very determined and terrible enemy,” said U.S. Senator John McCain.

There have been a high number of pilotless drone aircraft attacks in Pakistan since a double agent blew himself up at a U.S. base in Afghanistan on December 30, killing seven CIA agents.

That blast, which marked a huge CIA intelligence failure, will pile pressure on the U.S. military to kill high-profile militants based along the Afghan-Pakistan frontier.

Drones are seen by the United States as one of the most effective weapons to achieve that goal in a global hub for militants, including top al Qaeda and Taliban figures.

The strikes have killed some prominent al Qaeda militants.

Pakistan has not objected to ones that have killed militants fighting the Pakistani state, such as Pakistan Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud.

It does oppose strikes on what it sees as strategic regional assets such as the Afghan Haqqani militant group. Pakistan believes the group can give it leverage in Afghanistan if the country is gripped by chaos again.

STRATEGIC COMPLEXITIES

At the same time the al Qaeda-linked Haqqani group is high on the U.S. hit list, and speculation is growing it may have been linked to the bomb attack on the CIA, illustrating the complexities and sensitivities in U.S.-Pakistani ties.

The subject of drones was raised when a delegation of U.S. senators led by McCain met Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari on Thursday.

The delegation also met Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani, as well as army chief general Ashfaq Kayani. He is the most important official because the military makes security decisions and effectively sets foreign policy.

Drone attacks are a politically charged issue between the United States and ally Pakistan, which Washington sees as the front-line state in its war against the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Pakistan fears the strikes could undermine efforts to deal with militancy because the civilian casualties inflame public anger and bolster support for the fighters.

Asked if he worried civilian casualties would give the United States’ enemies a propaganda boost and that the drone strikes raise the issue of sovereignty, McCain told reporters:

“I understand very well that there are elements operating in Pakistan that if allowed to do so would go to Afghanistan and kill Americans and destroy that government and re-establish Afghanistan as a base for attacks on the United States and our allies. That’s what I understand.”

McCain suggested there were no other options under consideration if the drone strikes failed to deliver enough results.

Asked if he would support U.S. ground operations on Pakistani soil, McCain said he had never been briefed that that was under consideration.

“Very frankly, I think it would have to be done in coordination and in agreement with the Pakistani government and military,” he said.

Pakistan’s reluctance to go after the Haqqani network, whose leader worked with the CIA in the 1980s against Soviet occupation troops in Afghanistan, has strained ties with Washington.

The U.S. embassy has accused Pakistan of taking provocative action and making false allegations against U.S. personnel. U.S. officials say Pakistan is also stalling their visa applications.

“It’s a point of friction. We would like to see it resolved. We would like to see the visas granted that are necessary for our embassy to do our job,” said McCain.

Al Qaeda’s Afghan wing has claimed responsibility for the suicide bombing, the second-most deadly attack in CIA history, saying it was revenge for the deaths of militant leaders, including Mehsud, who was killed in a drone attack.

His death has not eased Pakistan Taliban bombings which have killed hundreds in retaliation for a security offensive.

At least six people were killed in Karachi on Friday when explosives being stored in an suspected militant hideout apparently went off accidentally, police said.

by Michael Georgy. Additional reporting by Faisal Aziz in Karachi. This article was originally published by Reuters

After setbacks, Zardari may have weathered storm

Friday, January 8th, 2010

By Saeed Shah – McClatchy Newspapers

Pakistan’s U.S.-backed president, Asif Ali Zardari, appears to have survived a campaign to oust him, a storm that had threatened to sidetrack the country from its battle with Islamic extremists.

Although there were predictions in the last few months of 2009 that he was finished, Zardari has defended himself aggressively in recent days and won some political allies. The news media and the judiciary had appeared to be closing in on him, but in a world of political shadow boxing, many analysts and politicians think that Pakistan ‘s powerful military has been behind the drive to force the president out of office.

“I think he is fighting back admirably,” said Abida Hussain, a senior member of Zardari’s Pakistan People’s Party. “He threw down the gauntlet, fair and square, and the conspirators, if any, seem to be backing off.”

The confrontation had sparked fears that the army, which has ruled Pakistan for most of its existence, would intervene again, perhaps to force fresh elections when the country is under pressure from the Obama administration to launch an offensive in North Waziristan , a vital Pakistani refuge for al-Qaida and the Taliban.

The army chief, Gen. Ashfaq Kayani, has let it be known repeatedly that he’s not interested in getting involved in politics, but the Pakistan Peoples Party, the country’s largest political party, remains wary. Under pressure from Washington , Zardari and the country’s civilian leaders have pushed the military for greater action against Islamic extremists.

“If you have the civilians and the military at loggerheads, it creates a more confusing picture for the Americans, an extra layer of uncertainty,” said Cyril Almeida, a newspaper columnist for Dawn, a Pakistani daily newspaper. “And the fight in Pakistan is moving from counterinsurgency to the more delicate phase of counterterrorism, for which you need coordination between agencies and between the civilian and military apparatus.”

The importance of North Waziristan, in northwest Pakistan , was underscored Wednesday by another U.S. missile strike in the area, which is a stronghold for the Haqqani network, considered a close ally of al-Qaida and the most dangerous insurgent group in Afghanistan . It was the fifth such strike since a suicide bomber killed a group of CIA officers in the adjacent Afghan province of Khost last week. According to news reports, 12 people were killed in the latest strike.

Separately, a suicide bomber hit a military camp Wednesday in the Pakistani portion of the Kashmir region, which Pakistan and India both claim, killing three soldiers.

Retaliatory terrorist attacks have killed more than 600 people since Pakistan launched a military offensive in the fall against the Pakistani Taliban in South Waziristan . The South Waziristan operation and a similar offensive in the Swat valley last year were possible largely because the civilians and military worked together, swaying public opinion.

In a series of pugnacious speeches and pronouncements since Dec. 27, Zardari has said that democracy in Pakistan is in danger, without spelling out the source of the threat.

“Whether it’s an internal conspiracy against democracy or external conspiracy against Pakistan , we will fight them with the support of the masses,” he said in a speech Saturday.

Many members of Pakistan ‘s military establishment despise Zardari for his past alleged corruption and for interfering in sensitive security policy since he was elected in 2008. Given that the last period of military rule ended only that year and had become deeply unpopular, the army is thought to be wary of seizing power again. The chief military spokesman, Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas, didn’t return calls seeking comment.

The Supreme Court appeared to deal the final blow to Zardari last month when it ruled that an amnesty that had ended pending corruption cases against the president and some ministers was unconstitutional.

After the court verdict Dec. 16, however, no one resigned from the government, and Zardari’s political party decided to fight the graft charges in the courts. Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, who some speculated could be separated from Zardari, leaped to the defense of the president.

Zardari also got strong backing from the leader of the Awami National Party, which runs the provincial government in Pakistan ‘s insurgency-plagued North West Frontier Province . In recent days, three of the four provincial parliaments passed resolutions in favor of the president.

Crucially, opposition leader Nawaz Sharif, whom a military coup ousted from his post as prime minister in 1999, hasn’t called for Zardari’s resignation and has warned against unconstitutional moves. “Our problems are the gift of dictatorship,” Sharif said Wednesday.

“The politicians as a whole are behaving very maturely,” said Ayaz Amir, a member of parliament with Sharif’s party, the Pakistan Muslim League-N. “It’s because of the perception on the part of the political class that if the (democratic) system goes, then everything goes down the drain.”

How Democracies Deal with Corruption

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

By Sadiq Saleem

Ending corruption is a noble and popular cause that has, in the past, been used in Pakistan to undermine democracy. As Pakistan’s Supreme Court vigorously adopts this cause with the support of a zealous media it is important to remember that the job of courts is not to do what is popular but rather what is judicious. Legal action against the allegedly corrupt must be taken without undermining the democratic system or overturning the mandate given by the people in a general election.

The Supreme Court declared the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) that came into effect on October 5, 2007 ultra vires on grounds that it was discriminatory. (more…)

Ten Year Deception

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

By Sadiq Saleem

The purpose of this particular type of accountability was never to deal with the problem of corruption but to create hype about it. Hence, phrases like “Looti hui daulat qaum ko wapis kee jaye” (Return the looted wealth to the nation) are bandied about without dealing with the substantive legal issues.

The reason why former Ehtesab supremo, the notorious Saif-ur-Rehman, came up with the figure $1.5 billion as the amount “stolen” by Zardari was that it sounded good in propaganda. Otherwise his Ehtesab Bureau never really identified properties or initiated substantive cases that amounted to that value. The Supreme Court must ask the Ehtesab Bureau’s successor NAB why, if its claim of $1500 million in assets is correct, cases in international courts led to freezing of only $73 million ($60 million in Swiss courts and $13 million in the case of the Surrey Mansion in England).

(more…)

Zardari falls but Kayani rises

Sunday, December 20th, 2009

By C. Raja Mohan

Whether he quits or not, President Asif Ali Zardari has been so severely weakened that he no longer poses a threat to Pakistan’s permanent establishment. In fact the Army Chief Ashfaq Kayani might prefer holding a de-fanged Zardari prisoner in Islamabad’s presidential palace and run the country with the pliable Yousuf Raza Gilani as the Prime Minister.

Barely two years ago a discredited Army leadership under Gen. Pervez Musharraf was forced to compromise with the civilian political leaders. Now the Army is back as the arbiter of the nation’s domestic politics amidst a civilian disarray.

Kayani may in fact be better placed than his predecessor Musharraf, who had all the disadvantages of being legally responsible for running the country. Kayani, in contrast, has all the effective power in without being accountable to any one.

(more…)

CJ: Please initiate suo moto action about these issues

Sunday, December 20th, 2009

By Bilal Qureshi

Here is a brilliant idea for Pakistan’s Chief Justice, who is crazy about Suo Moto Action – initiate Suo Moto action against the perpetrators of orchestrating an attack on Pakistan’s Supreme Court at a time when Nawaz Sharif was about to be disqualified for public office. And, fortunately, Chaudhry Iftikhar has plenty of people who are willing to volunteer to assist him. After all, Iftikhar Chaudhry is (supposedly) fighting for free and independent judiciary. Right?
If the issue of NRO, which is insignificant given Pakistan’s other challenges, can be tried and decided rather quickly, why can’t the issue of attacking the most respectable institution in Pakistan, that is the attack on the Supreme Court be examined? Isn’t it time that Chief Justice (R) Sajad Ali Shah get justice? Otherwise, people would argue that people from smaller provinces, especially from Sindh are being targeted.

(more…)



Powered by Hashe!