Login | Sign Up

Posts Tagged ‘Featured’

Is Pakistan an ally in the war on terror?

Tuesday, December 28th, 2010

The Pakistani government’s decision to halt the flow of NATO supplies into Afghanistan through the Torkham Gate during the first week of October has led many Americans to believe that Pakistan is not fully committed to the fight against militant extremism.

That notion is insulting. Pakistani support of US-led efforts in Afghanistan is complicated. Pakistan has more than 147,800 troops deployed conducting combat operations in the tribal areas along the Afghan border.

The Pakistan army has lost more than 3,200 soldiers in recent fighting (more…)

Richard Holbrooke: Pakistan mourns longtime diplomat

Tuesday, December 14th, 2010

By Nicolas Brulliard – Global Post

Pakistani officials today mourned the death of longtime diplomat Richard C. Holbrooke, who they said played a pivotal role over the past two years in working to improve relations between the United States and its strategic ally.

Holbrooke, the special U.S. representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan, died Monday in Washington after undergoing surgery on his torn aorta.

Pakistan’s highest-ranking politicians said the country had lost a friend in (more…)

Aid group banned from Pakistan

Friday, December 10th, 2010

The US government banned a major American nonprofit group from receiving new funding due to its alleged misconduct involving a $150 million project in Pakistan.

The United States Agency for International Development, USAID, in its semiannual report to US Congress said an initial inquiry had found evidence of misconduct by the Academy for Educational Development. (more…)

Pak-US relationship based on “co-dependency”

Friday, December 10th, 2010

The relationship between the United States and Pakistan has been for too long transactional in nature while at the same time based on mutual mistrust, the former American envoy to Islamabad said in a cable to Washington in 2009. The document was published Sunday by the whistle blower Web site WikiLeaks.

Ambassador Anne Patterson’s communique was sent ahead of (more…)

Frenemies in need can be friends indeed

Thursday, October 21st, 2010

By Arif Rafiq

Senior Pakistani and U.S. officials meet today in Washington to start what’s being billed as the third in a series of high-level “strategic dialogues” between the two war on terror partners.

Over the remainder of this week, thirteen working groups on a wide variety of issues, ranging from energy to women’s empowerment, will finalize their recommendations for enhancing cooperation and furthering objectives that are said to be mutually shared. A few major transactions, including a new $2 billion military aid package, will reportedly be announced. But the pomp, circumstance, and scale of the pledges belie the reality that Islamabad and Washington are as much strategic competitors as they are partners.

Glaringly, the two governments are pursuing separate and largely antagonistic endgames to the Afghan war. Recent press reports claim that NATO is facilitating peace talks between the Karzai government and Afghan insurgents, including the infamous Haqqani network that the Pakistani military allegedly sponsors to purge Afghanistan of arch-rival India’s influence.

General David Petraeus is promoting (or wants us to believe he is) a peace process in Afghanistan sans Pakistan but with the very groups that the Pakistani military-intelligence apparatus has urged the United States and Afghan President Hamid Karzai to reach out to. Yet, at the same time, the United States is asking Pakistan to smack the hornets’ nest in the North Waziristan tribal area, home to the Haqqani network.

Why would Pakistan create bad blood with an entity that could very well be integrated into the Afghan power structure in the coming years in a U.S.-endorsed reconciliation process? So its own Taliban-style insurgencies can live on even after the Afghan war comes to an end?

Unlike the United States, Pakistan cannot engage in a front-loaded withdrawal from the region. Barring a dramatic subcontinental drift, Pakistan and Afghanistan are — in Karzai’s words — “conjoined twins.” What goes on in Afghanistan doesn’t always stay in Afghanistan — it often bleeds into Pakistan. The thousands of Pakistani civilians and security personnel killed since 9/11 are case in point.

Pakistan and the United States can continue their transactional relationship. But no amount of money will induce Pakistan to commit strategic suicide. And no American president can be indifferent toward a safe haven in Pakistan where terrorist plots against the United States have been and continue to be plotted.

Maintenance of the status quo will not produce a lasting peace in Afghanistan, which is essential to the security of both Pakistan and the United States. Only a joint effort by the United States, (the predominant occupying force in Afghanistan) and Pakistan (the entity with the most leverage over Afghan insurgents) can end the thirty-year conflict in Afghanistan once and for all, and thereby seriously weaken regional and transnational militants in Pakistan’s border areas, such as al-Qaeda, that have thrived off of instability and foreign occupation across the Durand Line.

Pakistan, as the glue holding together a peace deal between the many Afghan factions and armed with a potent counterinsurgency force to man its frontier with Afghanistan, can serve as the guarantor for an enduring Afghan peace. But for this formula to even be fathomable requires adjustment by both Pakistan and the United States. Pakistan needs to take more seriously the threat posed to the United States and Western Europe by al-Qaeda and its affiliates inside its border regions with Afghanistan. And the United States will have to accommodate Pakistan’s legitimate fear that rising Indian influence in Afghanistan will result in it being strategically encircled by an emerging superpower on a $50 billion dollar military spending spree with which it’s fought three wars.

Peace in Afghanistan and containment or defeat of al-Qaeda are not possible if Pakistan and the United States work at cross-purposes. And so if the status quo continues, it will remain mission unaccomplished for both countries.

– Arif Rafiq is president of Vizier Consulting, LLC, which provides strategic guidance on Middle East and South Asian political and security issues. This piece was first published at the Foreign Policy website.

Between failure and misery

Monday, October 11th, 2010

By Bilal Qureshi

The strangely bizarre and comical launch of Musharraf’s so called Muslim League (or whatever name he is using) forced me to examine Pakistan. And, believe me, this time; I really looked hard not only at today’s Pakistan but also at its short, but awfully tumultuous history. And, it is extremely distressing to realize that nothing, and by nothing I really meaning NOTHING has worked so for or in Pakistan since its creation in 1947. The only good thing that I can report about Pakistan is that despite tremendous financial, social and religious gaps within the society, once upon a time, Pakistan was indeed a peaceful place where people did live in peace, and harmony.

However, nothing could be more tragic than today’s Pakistan

Let us be clear about Pakistan and judging from the evidence, it seems unlikely that the country will ever be a success story. Everything about Pakistan suggests failure, misery and more failure and misery. No question, people will continue to believe that ‘things will improve’, but I hate to be the guy to break this to the believers – not going to happen, sorry.

What I have come to believe is that Pakistan is a textbook example of classical failure as a state. Right from the start when Pakistan came into being, the country was shaky, poor, and unprepared. To make matters worse, it has always been one problem after another and with each passing day, month, year or a decade, the overall situation has continued to deteriorate through out the country.

Yes, it is true that the love of Pakistan will continue to prevent people within the country to deny that the country has not been a success story. For varying reasons, people will maintain that ‘if only this changes or that power leaves us alone’, Pakistan will be fine. Different ethnic, religious and political groups divided along ideological and territorial lines will advance strong, but naïve reasons for defending Pakistan in spite of daily suicide bombings, beheadings, stoning, growing poverty, frightening population explosion, and so on so forth. And, those who question Pakistan’s overall physiological, political, and economical health would still be considered ‘traitors, foreign agents and enemies of Pakistan’ but this bullying by the misguided must not stop those who argue for a different course.

Nations (Pakistanis still have to forge a national bond to become a nation) don’t succeed or fail in a day or two. It takes generations to become successful and it takes miraculous harmony and exceptional commitment to keep the progress alive and the society to thrive, something that has not happened in Pakistan. Unless people in Pakistan from all walks of life fully understand that emotional rants, hyper charged rhetoric, insane conspiracy theories, and the desire to ‘conquer’ everything and everyone else is not the way to make Pakistan a success story, things are not change or improve, period.

For Pakistanis, the first goal must be to become realistic and accept ground realities, even if it makes them question everything they have been told about Pakistan’s history and its future. Loyalty to Pakistan does not, and it should not mean accepting the narrative put forward by the judiciary, jihadists, and judges and yes, even generals. On the contrary, country’s love makes it a patriotic duty to not be conned by shady judges, crooked journalists, and dishonest politicians. Nope, people of Pakistan will have to decide, independently, about what is good for them and what is good for their country.

The men on horseback

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

By Dr Manzur Ejaz

We can appreciate the military’s flood relief work but if this disaster is partly man-made, the military has to take responsibility because it has been ruling the country most of the time

The Pakistani military’s help during these devastating floods is appropriate but not outstanding because people have complained about its delayed response. The military’s flood relief work is not exceptional because no other institution in any country has such a large and organised force that it can take care of a disaster of the scale where one-fifth of the population is affected. Even the US had to bring in army engineers during Hurricane Katrina. The only difference is that in democratic countries, (more…)

The mob mentality

Saturday, August 28th, 2010

By Zafar Syed

The Bystander Effect: An attempt to understand the social psychology of the mob

The brutal murder of two teenage brothers in Sialkot has sent shudders of fear and loathing across the spine of the society. People are asking probing questions about our values and morals as a nation. Some have even felt shame to be a Pakistani due to the incident. More than the murder itself, the outrage has been directed towards the behavior of the onlookers and their apathy is being condemned by all parts of the society. The onlookers included cameramen who shot the event in all its bloody details to haunt the conscience of the entire
nation.

But before publicly lynching the insensitive crowd (more…)

The victim blame game

Monday, August 16th, 2010

By Zafar Syed

Pop star turned proselytizer and self-appointed religious scholar Junaid Jamshed hosts a TV show on a Pakistani channel where he expresses his views about everything between the earth and the sky, and sometimes, things that are neither found neither on the earth nor in the skies.

A couple of days back he said something about the flood victims that was profoundly disturbing and morally shocking. He said in a very passionate and self-righteous tone:

I was among some people who had the audacity to say that this is the result of the Global Warming. No, it’s not … It’s due to my and your sins!!!

This statement is so damaging, cruel and heartless that I don’t know where to start. What’s more, this is not an isolated opinion: there is no shortage of mullahs in Pakistan, former pop stars or otherwise, who think on the same lines. In essence, they are blaming those poor, poor victims for this calamity: they were sinners, so God unleashed his fury to take them to task. In other words, they got what they deserved, so there is no need to grieve for those millions and millions of shelterless, hungry, sick, despondent people who lost everything they had.

And why is that every time God punishes only the people of Pakistan? Be it in the form of the devastating earthquake of 2005, or the relentless spell of terror that has shaken the foundation of the country over the past four years, or the fantastically inept bureaucracy or the corrupt-to-the-bones leadership, or this fresh curse, Pakistan seems to be the most blighted nation on earth today. So what does JJ have to say why the God’s fury batters only Pakistanis, while the rest of the world goes mostly scot free?

“It’s because we are the chosen people. Just like one cares more about one’s own child compared to a neighbor’s, God care more about the Muslim Ummah and thus he warns them by those catastrophes in this world to shield them from the eternal damnation … so that they are jolted to action right here and now to straighten up their lives.”

But the problem is that there are more than one and a half billion Muslims in the world, why does God treat them like a step-son and doesn’t hurl His wrath upon them to mend their ways? Or is Junaid Jamshed implying that the only true Muslims in the world are Pakistanis – who comprise only ten percent of the world’s Muslim population – and the rest of the 90 percent are somehow above the Divine Law? Do these people really think that the residents of Nowshera, Kalam, Kashmore or Dadu indulge in more transgressions than the Muslims of Dubai, Istanbul, Kuala Lumpur, or the nearly million Muslims of London, for that matter?

And whether it’s the earthquake or the floods or terrorism, why do only the people from the lowest strata of the society suffer? If it’s only sinners, than surely these cataclysms should have hit the builders that used more sand and less cement to build the schools which collapsed like cardboards during the earthquake … or those chaudharies, waderas, industrialists and politicians who suck the marrow of the hapless villagers.

In the current floods also the poorest of the poor have suffer the most. The chaudhary’s haveli, in any case, is built on a elevated plain with ample cement.

Accusing the victims may have another sinister consequence as well: It can discourage people from helping them. Why should one lend a hand to an evildoer who deserved what he got, anyway?

Moreover, such a defeatist approach is the greatest obstacle in the development of science and technology. When plagues are sent down by God, why bother trying to find a cure? Just shun your sinning ways. When earthquakes bury tens of thousands of school children alive in their classes, why build sturdier schools the next time? Just pray harder. When a flood wreaks havoc, why build dams and levees, just turn over the beads of the rosary more quickly.

It is said that when the Muslim armies laid siege to the Christian city of Damascus, the bishops urged people to pray to ward off the attackers. But within a few centuries the tables of history were turned and when the hordes of Helegu Khan surrounded the Muslim city of Baghdad, the ulema appealed for cumulative du’aa to thwart the Mongols.

Seven and a half centuries have between those events to this single most destructive episode in Muslim history but we have yet to learn our lessons.

Why the US cannot leave Afghanistan

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

By Dr Manzur Ejaz

Pakistan — poised to become an industrial society like South Korea — was subverted to become more like a pauper desert kingdom of the Gulf. Of course, Pakistan’s internal mechanism played a major role but as an external force, the US encouraged the regressive processes to take hold

The perception of CIA infallibly having the omnipotent powers of the Almighty has been destroyed by WikiLeaks’ disclosure of over 91,000 sensitive US security documents — amounting to the biggest leak in history and showed chinks in the CIA’s armour. However, some conspiracy theorists’ conclusion that it was a US-designed leak (more…)



Powered by Hashe!